8/23/2004
SWIFTLY, AS IN A MOURNING SURPRISE
As a true Uncommitted Voter In A Swing State, I feel it’s my duty to provide occasional glimpses into my psyche as I try to figure out who gets my vote in November. Lately I’ve been hearing a lot of flapperation about John Kerry and these Swift Boat Veterans For Truth.
I’ve seen the ads. Living in Wisconsin, it’s tough not to. And I will credit the Bush campaign for refusing to make an issue of Kerry’s military service. (After all, it’s not like W is Audie Murphy, and it’s also in keeping with the Bush campaign’s apparent strategy of not making an issue out of anything that doesn’t directly have to do with September 11.) But I’ve come to the conclusion that the whole issue of Kerry’s combat medals and what he did or did not do with them is a total non-starter with me.
A politician exaggerated his military service for political gain? A shavetail officer right out of training stretched the truth to get a shiny bit of metal? Really? Why, next thing you know, some politician might exaggerate his or her faith to make their opponents seem impious!
Seriously, it took me about a femtosecond to figure out that Kerry was going to hit us all with a double shot of Vietnam every time he opened his mouth. I tuned that stuff out a long time ago. Likewise, I’ve long believed that Vietnam was a stupid, ego-driven war, and I’m highly suspicious of anyone Kerry’s age who didn’t protest it. Picking on returning soldiers was boorish, but being against the Vietnam War? That was just being smart. So the throwing of the medals and the testimony also mean nothing to me. As I’ve said before, I’m pretty sure nobody deserves to be president, but somebody has to be. I don’t care about either Kerry’s or Bush’s military service. I don’t care about Bush’s “lost years” or DUI arrest(s).
Kerry has left the door wide, wide open for Bush. His waffling on Iraq and failings on the Senate Intelligence Committee truly trouble me. But Bush has done nothing to counter. I honestly wonder if the president has really started campaigning yet. Bush has said that the Vietnam attack ads should stop, and I think he’s right. All they’re doing now is annoying me. But I still don’t have what I need most–a reason to vote for either Bush or Kerry that has nothing to do with the fact that Bush is not Kerry, and Kerry is not Bush.
Generally speaking, when you have a hard time making up your mind between two choices, it indicates that you don’t perceive much of a difference between them. I think there are significant differences between the two, but the way Bush spends money, it’s getting less and less every day.
5 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

You’re not going to see much of a difference on current security and war issues. I think there’s a difference in the way they’d handle future international issues. I also think there’s a difference in how they’d collect and allocate government money.
Unfortunately, these differences have a greater amount of nuance, so they get overlooked for the Vietnam bullcrap. Honestly, I thought that if Bush (or his supporters) were going to pull out god-knows-what against Kerry for his service, then Kerry ought to have given MoveOn a free rein to bash Bush’s (lack of) service. But you’re right - ultimately, what people did decades ago isn’t nearly as important as what they’re going to do in the next four years.
Comment by Dave — 8/24/2004 @ 10:02 am
Mark, don’t be surprised if you get taken to task for not believing that the Swifties have a direct line to Karl Rove’s office.
As it happens, Kerry went after Bush’s ANG service back in April.
Comment by Jim Roberts-Miller — 8/24/2004 @ 8:26 pm
By the way, I recently commented on my own blog about the trouble hyping Vietnam got Kerry into. Probably with an excess of snark, I’m sorry to say.
Comment by JammerJim — 8/24/2004 @ 8:28 pm
Oh, I’m sure the GOP is at least marginally behind SBVftT, Jammer. And Kerry deserves to be taken down a peg for his stuck Vietnam button. But really, like I said, this whole thing isn’t convincing me much one way or the other.
I am wondering when Bush is going to get around to discussing a domestic policy issue that isn’t homeland security.
Comment by Mark Hasty — 8/24/2004 @ 10:05 pm
The problem is that the Bush campaign and cronies (including SBVT) are demonstrably lying about Kerry’s war record.
Comment by Vidiot — 8/25/2004 @ 11:45 pm