<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SWIFTLY, AS IN A MOURNING SURPRISE</title>
	<link>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/</link>
	<description>E AHO LA'ULA</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/#comment-1092</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/#comment-1092</guid>
					<description>You're not going to see much of a difference on current security and war issues.  I think there's a difference in the way they'd handle future international issues.  I also think there's a difference in how they'd collect and allocate government money.

Unfortunately, these differences have a greater amount of nuance, so they get overlooked for the Vietnam bullcrap.  Honestly, I thought that if Bush (or his supporters) were going to pull out god-knows-what against Kerry for his service, then Kerry ought to have given MoveOn a free rein to bash Bush's (lack of) service.  But you're right - ultimately, what people did decades ago isn't nearly as important as what they're going to do in the next four years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not going to see much of a difference on current security and war issues.  I think there&#8217;s a difference in the way they&#8217;d handle future international issues.  I also think there&#8217;s a difference in how they&#8217;d collect and allocate government money.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, these differences have a greater amount of nuance, so they get overlooked for the Vietnam bullcrap.  Honestly, I thought that if Bush (or his supporters) were going to pull out god-knows-what against Kerry for his service, then Kerry ought to have given MoveOn a free rein to bash Bush&#8217;s (lack of) service.  But you&#8217;re right - ultimately, what people did decades ago isn&#8217;t nearly as important as what they&#8217;re going to do in the next four years.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim Roberts-Miller</title>
		<link>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/#comment-1093</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/#comment-1093</guid>
					<description>Mark, don't be surprised if you get taken to task for not believing that the Swifties have a direct line to Karl Rove's office.

As it happens, Kerry went after Bush's ANG service back in April.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, don&#8217;t be surprised if you get taken to task for not believing that the Swifties have a direct line to Karl Rove&#8217;s office.</p>
<p>As it happens, Kerry went after Bush&#8217;s ANG service back in April.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JammerJim</title>
		<link>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/#comment-1094</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/#comment-1094</guid>
					<description>By the way, I recently commented on my own blog about the trouble hyping Vietnam got Kerry into.  Probably with an excess of snark, I'm sorry to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I recently commented on my own blog about the trouble hyping Vietnam got Kerry into.  Probably with an excess of snark, I&#8217;m sorry to say.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Hasty</title>
		<link>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/#comment-1095</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/#comment-1095</guid>
					<description>Oh, I'm sure the GOP is at least marginally behind SBVftT, Jammer.  And Kerry deserves to be taken down a peg for his stuck Vietnam button.  But really, like I said, this whole thing isn't convincing me much one way or the other.

I &lt;i&gt;am&lt;/i&gt; wondering when Bush is going to get around to discussing a domestic policy issue that isn't homeland security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m sure the GOP is at least marginally behind SBVftT, Jammer.  And Kerry deserves to be taken down a peg for his stuck Vietnam button.  But really, like I said, this whole thing isn&#8217;t convincing me much one way or the other.</p>
<p>I <i>am</i> wondering when Bush is going to get around to discussing a domestic policy issue that isn&#8217;t homeland security.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vidiot</title>
		<link>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/#comment-1096</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://markhasty.com/archives/2004/08/23/swiftly-as-in-a-mourning-surprise/#comment-1096</guid>
					<description>The problem is that the Bush campaign and cronies (including SBVT) are demonstrably lying about Kerry's war record.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that the Bush campaign and cronies (including SBVT) are demonstrably lying about Kerry&#8217;s war record.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
