11/12/2006
BLOGPOLL BALLOT, WEEK 11/2006
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohio State |  25 |
| 2 | Michigan | 24 |
| 3 | Florida | 23 |
| 4 | Arkansas | 22 |
| 5 | Southern Cal | 21 |
| 6 | Rutgers | 20 |
| 7 | Notre Dame | 19 |
| 8 | Wisconsin | 18 |
| 9 | West Virginia | 17 |
| 10 | Boise State | 16 |
| 11 | Wake Forest | 15 |
| 12 | LSU | 14 |
| 13 | Auburn | 13 |
| 14 | Texas | 12 |
| 15 | Louisville | 11 |
| 16 | Georgia Tech | 10 |
| 17 | California | 9 |
| 18 | Virginia Tech | 8 |
| 19 | Oklahoma | 7 |
| 20 | Maryland | 6 |
| 21 | Brigham Young | 5 |
| 22 | Boston College | 4 |
| 23 | Clemson | 3 |
| 24 | Nebraska | 2 |
| 25 | Central Michigan | 1 |
Dropped Out:
This is a draft. As usual, what did I screw up?
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Here’s a question: would you jump Rutgers to #3 if they beat West Virginia? Just curious, because a lot of people I’ve talked to don’t think they can get into the BCS championship game even if they win out.
Comment by Dave — 11/13/2006 @ 9:10 am
It would be a close call. Part of me would feel like I had to, because, even if I haven’t consistently respected Louisville throughout the year (they’re the Oregon of the east), I’ve always thought West Virginia was really good. And you have to give some credit for going undefeated in a BCS conference. The Big East may be easy to dis, but none of the BCS conferences are truly weak.
Well, except for the Big Ten this year.
Comment by Mark — 11/13/2006 @ 9:30 am